Bad news for overeaters who prefer their treats in the form of carbs and fat (cake, French fries, and chips come to mind). And good news for those who’d rather indulge with a nice steak.
Last week a fascinating study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, reported what had happened to the bodies of healthy adults who were overfed to the tune of 1,000 extra calories a day for 10 to 12 weeks. Oh—and they performed no exercise during this time.
Well, obviously they gained weight. But what they gained—how much muscle and how much fat—had everything to do with how much protein they consumed.
Let me give you the high points. People were divided into a low-protein group (6 percent of daily calories from protein), a normal-protein group (15 percent), and a high-protein group (26 percent). Carbohydrates were held more or less steady among the three groups, at 41 to 42 percent. The low-protein people ate quite a lot of fat—52 percent of daily calories; the others ate 44 and 33 percent fat, respectively.
Just FYI, the high-protein guys and gals were on something pretty close to the nutrient ratios favored by lots of bodybuilders and strength athletes.
So here’s the really interesting bit. The low-protein group gained much less weight. This gives me a chance to drive home the point I’m always making about why we should care about body fat, not weight.
Yup, they gained less “weight.” And what they gained was all fat.
In the meantime, they actually lost lean body mass—about .7 kilograms (1.5 pounds) on average. Why do we care about that? Because every ounce of lean mass (muscle) lost means a slower metabolism.
Let me give you a point-by-point summary of the results for all three groups:
Low-protein diet
- average weight gain of 3.16 kg
- average loss of .7 kg lean mass
- no increase of resting energy expenditure (amount of calories burned on a daily basis)
Summary: They gained fat and lost muscle. As the study authors put it, “the failure to increase lean body mass in the low-protein group accounted for their smaller weight gain.” Note that since they gained 3.16 kg of “weight” yet lost .7 kg of muscle, their total fat gain was an average of 3.86 kg. That’s a greater fat gain than the other two groups.
Moderate-protein diet
- average weight gain of 6.05 kg
- 3.18 kg of the weight gain was fat, 2.87 kg was lean mass
- increase in resting energy expenditure was 160 calories per day
Summary: These subjects gained both fat and muscle—about half and half.
High-protein diet
- average weight gain of 6.51 kg
- 3.33 kg of the gain was fat, 3.18 kg was lean mass
- increase in resting energy expenditure was 227 calories per day
Summary: Like the moderate-protein group, the high-protein group gained about equal amounts of fat and muscle.
Now, if people on a low-protein diet can lose lean mass (a metabolic disaster) even when they’re overeating by a significant amount, how much more likely is it that eating too little protein can cause a loss of lean mass when dieting? How much more likely when we’re over-dieting and slashing calories too dramatically?
It’s something I preach about a lot (you can see a recent sermon here) because women tend to be notorious undereaters of protein and—when dieting—under-consumers of calories.
My challenge to you: Given your daily caloric intake (if you’re not sure what it should be, use this calculator), figure out what 15 percent of calories from protein would be.
Let’s say your total daily energy expenditure is 2,000 calories. Multiply 2,000 x .15, and you get 300 calories.
Protein has four calories per gram. So if I divide 300 by 4, I get 75. That’s how many grams of protein you need per day if you’re shooting for a moderate-protein diet.
If your current intake provides less than 15 percent protein, consider beefing it up (pun intended) to get closer to that percentage.
Those who lift weights regularly and are committed to adding more muscle tissue (atta girl!), might consider 25 percent of daily calories from protein.
Added benefit: whether you’re dieting or maintaining weight, protein keeps you satisfied longer than either carbohydrates or fat. But that’s a post for another day.
Note: You can read the full study report here.
Flickr photo by artfulgourmetnyc
Are you over 40 and struggling with your weight? Feel like your metabolism is slowing to a crawl? Here’s the good news: You are not too old to create a lean, healthy body.
Just fill out the form below to receive
- my free report Take 10 Years Off Your Body
- free e-mail tips to help you permanently change your body and your life
- notice of free Q&A calls so I can answer all your fitness and fat-loss questions.

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }
Twitter: saraharrow
January 8, 2012 at 11:20 am
I have just started to add a protein shake to my diet, as I was convinced I wasn’t getting enough protein or of the right “quality”.
The study is fascinating in it’s outcomes, time to get off the coach I think!
Twitter: themusclediva
January 8, 2012 at 11:38 am
Good on you! You can also add high-quality protein powder (made from whey, no added sugar) to oatmeal or other cooked cereals (after cooking) for a nice morning boost.
Your article supports my own theory that more protein is necessary. I’ve been adding more protein to my diet especially on the days I run. I think it makes a difference in how I feel and my energy level. Although I don’t agree with the extreme diets like Atkins, I definitely believe there’s merit in removing the fries and adding some meat. My fav lunch… a nice big sandwich.. without the bread!
Yolanda recently posted..Red.Hot.Momentum on the Air – We’re LIVE!
Twitter: themusclediva
January 8, 2012 at 11:40 am
I completely agree. Endurance athletes know they need carbs, but they sometimes underplay the protein. Bodybuilders know about the need for protein but are often too ready to slash carbs. My own preference is something like 25 percent protein, 50 percent carbs, and 25 percent fat.
Necessary or not, what is often neglected about protein is that it is broken down primarily in the small intestine an is difficult, in more pure forms, to be broken down. Translation, more pure forms of protein are a great and natural appetite suppressant. I don’t anybody who, once they learn this, isn’t down with it!
Twitter: themusclediva
January 13, 2012 at 9:40 am
Good point, Roy. I agree. Protein is the most satiating macronutrient, and one of my personal rules is to get high-quality protein in every snack (five to 10 grams) and (of course) every meal.
Twitter: WorkoutNirvana
January 11, 2012 at 3:24 pm
Another great post Mary! You make such good points, one of which being that if you slash calories too much, you’re going to eat away at your lean muscle. Add in lack of protein and it’s a sad body comp indeed!
Suzanne recently posted..Fantastic Health & Body: One… Small Action… at a Time
Twitter: themusclediva
January 13, 2012 at 9:41 am
And then people end up burning fewer calories than before, which virtually guarantees they’ll regain any fat they lost.
Twitter: ChristineMiller
January 13, 2012 at 3:21 am
I love protein, find salad and veg suits me, and am perfectly happy eating like this – I feel and look much better when I keep the bread, pasta, cakes etc off the menu!
Christine Miller recently posted..How to fail your way to success
Twitter: themusclediva
January 13, 2012 at 9:42 am
Christine–thanks for commenting! Sounds like you’ve got a plan that’s working well for you.