Why you can keep the weight off

by Mary C. Weaver, CSCS, M.S. on December 31, 2011

woman walking on the beach

If you want to be discouraged about losing fat and keeping it off, by all means read “The Fat Trap,” published in The New York Times Magazine on Dec. 28. If you’re curious, here’s the link.

The article—very well-written, by the way—summarizes the thinking of a number of scientists who believe the evidence indicates that almost no one who loses fat can keep it off. I haven’t had my head in the sand for the past several decades, so I am well aware of these research threads as well as the empirical evidence that most people who lose fat eventually regain most or all of it.

But I am not discouraged about your chances or my chances of getting lean or staying lean for life, and I’m going to tell you why.

First, let’s look at one of the key studies and experts cited in the NYT article.

Joseph Proietto of the University of Melbourne, Australia, says that his patients, despite being highly motivated, “inevitably, gradually . . . regain the weight.”

What sort of food plan was used to help these patients lose fat? Ten weeks on a VLCD, or “very low calorie diet,” of about 500 to 550 calories a day.

In other words, medically supervised near-starvation. I’ve written about Dr. Proietto’s research before, and I have several unanswered questions about the study’s conclusions. (Here’s the article I published on Oct. 29, 2011, on the topic.)

My primary burning question: would a much more moderate caloric-restriction plan (involving cutting something like 250 to 500 calories a day) have achieved a different result?

And although no such studies are cited, another expert quoted by the NYT says “the pace of weight loss is unlikely to make a difference because the body’s warning system is based solely on how much fat a person loses, not how quickly he or she loses it.”

Well, based on what research? No supporting facts are given.

Apparently Dr. Proietto is currently looking at the effects of slower fat-loss methods. That sounds promising, and I will be eager to learn what he discovers.

Question 2: How much muscle mass did the study participants lose during their 10-week diet? (Probably quite a lot, given their VLCD.) How much muscle would they have lost on a moderately restrictive diet? (Loss of muscle mass = reduced metabolic rate. Read my two-part series on increasing your metabolism here and here.)

Question 3: When the participants stopped dieting after 10 weeks, how did their eating habits change? Did they begin to eat at maintenance level? Or did they return to their old habits immediately or eventually (meaning, did they start consuming more calories than they needed, which is how they gained weight in the first place)? Was anyone monitoring them?

Question 4: Were they taught how to maintain their weight with a calorie-controlled food plan and exercise?

Question 5: Would the results have been different (I suspect yes) if they had been engaged in resistance training in order to build muscle, which would have increased their metabolic rate and thus helped them keep the fat off?

Everyone agrees that the best way to lose fat is with a combination of caloric restriction (“dieting”) and exercise. And the best—really, the only—way to maintain that fat loss is to continue to exercise and to eat at maintenance level (consuming just as many calories as the body burns daily).

Where are the studies that examine whether people who do these things regain or not? There’s one very intriguing project that does track these people, and it’s the National Weight Control Registry.

If you are a successful “loser” who has lost at least 30 pounds and maintained the loss for at least one year, you are a candidate to join the registry. Here’s a blurb from the website:

The National Weight Control Registry (NWCR), established in 1994 by Rena Wing, Ph.D., from Brown Medical School, and James O. Hill, Ph.D., from the University of Colorado, is the largest prospective investigation of long-term successful weight loss maintenance. Given the prevailing belief that few individuals succeed at long-term weight loss, the NWCR was developed to identify and investigate the characteristics of individuals who have succeeded at long-term weight loss. The NWCR is tracking over 10,000 individuals who have lost significant amounts of weight and kept it off for long periods of time. Detailed questionnaires and annual follow-up surveys are used to examine the behavioral and psychological characteristics of weight maintainers, as well as the strategies they use to maintaining their weight losses.

How do they do it? Visit the website for details, but these successful maintainers eat breakfast, control food portions, and exercise daily, among other things. That’s what maintenance takes: permanent lifestyle change.

It’s not impossible lifestyle change, and as one of the women quoted in the NYT piece says, it requires constant vigilance.

You have to decide whether a life of health and high energy is worth vigilance. It is to me.

It’s worth the effort to recovering alcoholics or drug addicts or former smokers. They too have to be vigilant. But I don’t see a lot of NYT articles discussing how stopping drinking, drugging, or smoking is nearly impossible.

Yes, we live in an obesigenic culture, and there are about a million reasons why it’s easier now to get fat than ever before in history. Yes, it’s very difficult to lose fat and keep it off. I will never sugar-coat the work involved.

But I hate like hell when the media use science to discourage the very people who desperately need to believe they can achieve their fat-loss goals.

I know you can. And I believe in you because I believe human beings were meant for challenge, struggle, and mastery.

Fat loss and maintenance are very hard work indeed. And absolutely worth the effort.

 

Be Sociable, Share!
Transform your body, change your life!

Are you over 40 and struggling with your weight? Feel like your metabolism is slowing to a crawl?

Here’s the good news: You are not too old to create a lean, healthy body.

Just fill out the form below to receive
  • my free report Take 10 Years Off Your Body
  • free e-mail tips to help you permanently change your body and your life
  • notice of free Q&A calls so I can answer all your fitness and fat-loss questions. 
I respect your e-mail privacy and will never share your details.


Powered by WPSubscribers

{ 19 comments… read them below or add one }

Beth Novick
Twitter:
January 1, 2012 at 12:21 pm

Go, Mary! As a fellow fat-fighter, these kinds of articles are sensational and provoking, and I don’t mean that in a good way. The average person who struggles with weight doesn’t have the knowledge to ask the questions you do in response to the study. They see it as either 1) a reason to stop trying, or 2) an EXCUSE to stop trying.

Slow, steady, moderate weight loss through gradual changes in nutrition and exercise have been proven time and again to produce the best, longest-lasting results. It’s not new, sexy, easy, or exciting, but it works.

Keep fighting the good fight, Mary!

Reply

Mary C. Weaver, CSCS, M.S.
Twitter:
January 1, 2012 at 1:19 pm

Beth, thanks so much for visiting and commenting.

I worry a lot about the point you mention—that people will be so discouraged that they give up trying to become healthy altogether. The sad thing is that all the methods they’ve tried so far may have made change impossible—yet they will blame themselves, not the impossible fad diets that nobody could possibly stick to.

Time for us to create a community where people can learn about tools that work and receive the support and encouragement to keep going when life change is difficult. :-)

Reply

Emergefit January 2, 2012 at 9:11 am

This was excellent. I’ll throw something else out there that isn’t considered by many:

I have been associated with and aided dozens throughout the years, who have lost 30 pounds or more and kept if off for more than a year. Some lost in excess of 100 pounds.

Some things they have in common:

- Daily walking
- Increased frequency of eating
- All but one, ALL BUT ONE, ended up leaving their marriage or relationship

What most people fail to view as a result of successful weight-loss is this; give a middle aged man or woman a new body after years of obesity, and their partner doesn’t have a chance. Sadly, there is no empirical data on this — no studies for a taboo subject. Maybe someday.

Be careful what you wish for…

Reply

Mary C. Weaver, CSCS, M.S.
Twitter:
January 2, 2012 at 8:16 pm

I can’t imagine how threatening it must be to the partner who *hasn’t* lost weight and suddenly ends up with a mate who wants to live in a completely different way.

Thanks for your kind comment!

Reply

Lisa Wood
Twitter:
January 4, 2012 at 8:47 pm

Wow, that’s a really sad statistic…
Lisa Wood recently posted..WordPress 3.3 Is Out: Here’s What’s NewMy Profile

Reply

Sarah Arrow
Twitter:
January 2, 2012 at 6:46 pm

I live the idea that it’s lifestyle change that takes place and not fat loss or weight loss plans. I suppose it would be unnoticeable to make a few small changes and sustain them, compared to huge changes that are unsustainable?
Sarah Arrow recently posted..101 wonderful women bloggers for 2012My Profile

Reply

Mary C. Weaver, CSCS, M.S.
Twitter:
January 2, 2012 at 8:36 pm

Lifestyle change all the way!

It’s not that a few small changes wouldn’t be noticeable—just that it would take time to notice, for example, a relatively slow rate of fat loss, and many people don’t have the patience to wait for it.

The other point is that the small changes *do* have to result in at least a small energy deficit. That is, someone could take up walking 30 minutes a day and burn 200 calories a pop. But if she is eating 200 calories more than she requires, she’s going to get healthier from the walking but won’t lose any fat. The walking is just compensating for the overeating.

But if she’s eating at maintenance level and burning those 200 calories by walking, she will very likely burn off about 20 pounds of fat in one year (plus or minus a bit for individual variation). If she weighs 200 pounds to start, she’s lost 10 percent of her bodyweight in a year, and that’s a point at which significant health benefits kick in.

Reply

Sarah Arrow
Twitter:
January 4, 2012 at 2:21 pm

Wise words as always Mary – thank you
Sarah Arrow recently posted..10 Keys To Having More Energy in 2012My Profile

Reply

Yolanda January 3, 2012 at 4:10 pm

Very interesting stuff. I’ve read the “you will regain lost weight” ideas for some time and they are discouraging.

I agree that the only way to really lose and keep weight off is both diet and exercise. I bet that most folks who lose the weight and can’t keep it off are willing to admit that they aren’t watching caloric intake as closely. It’s easy to get off track because restaurant portion sizes are so distorted and it’s also amazing how having a McDonald’s cheeseburger is less calories than one of their salads so what we think might be healthy for us just isn’t.
Yolanda recently posted..Success: What Exactly Are You Doing… Right Now?My Profile

Reply

Mary C. Weaver, CSCS, M.S.
Twitter:
January 3, 2012 at 6:26 pm

You make an excellent point about the McD cheeseburger. No, it’s not health food, but that ordinary cheeseburger has just 300 calories, and a person could do worse in a pinch. An average restaurant caesar salad is probably closer to 800 calories, with a whole lot more fat.

Reply

Lisa Wood
Twitter:
January 4, 2012 at 8:50 pm

I rarely eat “fast food”, but I was at Quiznos the other day and noticed that their torpedo, which is one of the smallest sandwiches available, was over 800 calories – what an eye opener that was!

Livestyle – diet and exercise. That’s the only way to lose and keep it off. Fast weight loss doesn’t stay off, fad diets don’t work over the long term, and weight loss is not easy. It’s that simple.
Lisa Wood recently posted..WordPress 3.3 Is Out: Here’s What’s NewMy Profile

Reply

Mary C. Weaver, CSCS, M.S.
Twitter:
January 5, 2012 at 7:07 am

You’ve got it in a nutshell!

Reply

Suzanne
Twitter:
January 6, 2012 at 12:34 pm

Mary, your blog just keeps amazing me with your thoughtful and insightful posts. This is one of your best! It’s fascinating and as we discussed, I had similar questions regarding the study. Keep up the FABULOUS work!
Suzanne recently posted..Step Up to Strong, Sexy GlutesMy Profile

Reply

Mary C. Weaver, CSCS, M.S.
Twitter:
January 7, 2012 at 9:18 pm

Hey, Suzanne–

Thank you so much for your very kind comments!

Reply

Cheng January 12, 2012 at 3:21 pm

Great article for fatty people but what about us (underweight people) please write an article on how to increase weight? I even increase my diet.
Cheng recently posted..Crohns DiseaseMy Profile

Reply

Mary C. Weaver, CSCS, M.S.
Twitter:
January 13, 2012 at 9:38 am

Cheng–you make an excellent point. The short answer to how to increase weight for those who are underweight: get a gym membership and start training with weights; some cardio is fine but not too much (30 minutes per session maximum and not more than three or four days a week); eat plenty of protein–at least 15 percent of daily calories; figure out what your caloric requirements are and then add a few hundred calories a day; and finally, track weight and body composition to determine whether you are gaining weight, and if you are, whether it’s mostly muscle. Good luck to you!

Reply

Christine Miller
Twitter:
January 13, 2012 at 3:13 am

I have a friend who lost around 90 pounds on a VLCD which combines the diet with counselling (Lighter Life). She’s kept the weight off for three years now, and having spent time with her over Xmas I can confirm she eats ‘normally’. By which I mean she eats regular food that is available at parties and dinners…canapes, nuts, etc etc….

But – she has a regular exercise regime, and she has learned when to stop. She doesn’t stuff herself with calories, especially empty ones. So she balances things out.

A quick note regarding heavy calorie content – I know someone who is quite slim who recently found themselves gaining weight after changing where they bought their lunchtime sandwich – at the outlet they switched to, a prominent UK ‘ready to eat’ emporium, the healthy-seeming sandwich of choice was a hefty 654 calories…without a drink, or anything else. As pointed out above, they could have had a McD’s quarter pounder with cheese for half that!
Christine Miller recently posted..How to fail your way to successMy Profile

Reply

Mary C. Weaver, CSCS, M.S.
Twitter:
January 13, 2012 at 9:50 am

Your friend: that’s a fabulous achievement. She’s a real success story.

Reply

julie January 23, 2012 at 9:47 am

I am not under the impression that people don’t make enough leptin, the problem is that they lose their sensitivity to it.

julie recently posted..Holidays, finallyMy Profile

Reply

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge

Previous post:

Next post: